<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2658-6533</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Results in Biomedicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2658-6533</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8955-2017-3-3-3-11</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1166</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Medicine (miscellaneous)</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ACUTE APPENDICITIS IN A RARE VARIANT OF INVAGINATION OF THE VERMIFORM APPENDIX. CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>ACUTE APPENDICITIS IN A RARE VARIANT OF INVAGINATION OF THE VERMIFORM APPENDIX. CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Dolzhikov</surname><given-names>Aleksandr A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dolzhikov</surname><given-names>Aleksandr A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>dolzhikov@bsuedu.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Migunov</surname><given-names>Andrei A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Migunov</surname><given-names>Andrei A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Lugovskoy</surname><given-names>Sergei L.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Lugovskoy</surname><given-names>Sergei L.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/medicine/2017/3/3-11.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The pathology of the vermiform appendix remains one of the topical issues of abdominal surgery. Some of its diseases are rare, but may present difficulties for diagnosis and treatment and are fraught with serious complications. These include invagination (intussusception) in isolated form or with other structures of the ileo-cecal region. Invagination may be caused by other previously unidentified lesions (benign or malignant tumors, mucocele, endometriosis, parasites). On the other hand, the invaginated appendix simulate tumor and tumor-like forms of the cecum and lead to diagnostic errors. The article describes a rare case of a complex variant of appendicular invagination with acute appendicitis. According to the morphological data, the possible mechanism of invagination was as follows: invagination of the appendix from its tip into itself with the fragments of mesappendix, later followed by complete invagination into the cecum &amp;ndash; type V due to the progression of type I, according to classification of McSwain. The wall of the invaginated appendix had an inverted structure with an external disposition of the mucosa. The literature data relating to the history of the study of the problem, classifications, causes and mechanisms of appendicular invagination are reviewed.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The pathology of the vermiform appendix remains one of the topical issues of abdominal surgery. Some of its diseases are rare, but may present difficulties for diagnosis and treatment and are fraught with serious complications. These include invagination (intussusception) in isolated form or with other structures of the ileo-cecal region. Invagination may be caused by other previously unidentified lesions (benign or malignant tumors, mucocele, endometriosis, parasites). On the other hand, the invaginated appendix simulate tumor and tumor-like forms of the cecum and lead to diagnostic errors. The article describes a rare case of a complex variant of appendicular invagination with acute appendicitis. According to the morphological data, the possible mechanism of invagination was as follows: invagination of the appendix from its tip into itself with the fragments of mesappendix, later followed by complete invagination into the cecum &amp;ndash; type V due to the progression of type I, according to classification of McSwain. The wall of the invaginated appendix had an inverted structure with an external disposition of the mucosa. The literature data relating to the history of the study of the problem, classifications, causes and mechanisms of appendicular invagination are reviewed.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>vermiform appendix</kwd><kwd>invagination</kwd><kwd>appendicitis</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>vermiform appendix</kwd><kwd>invagination</kwd><kwd>appendicitis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>1. Kaliteevsky P.F. Diseases of vermiform appendix. М.: Меditsina,1970. Pp. 123-124. Russian.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>2. Rukosuev K.S. A rare case of invagination of vermiform appendix . Аrkhiv patologii. 1962. 2. Pp. 80-82. Russian.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>3. Atkinson G.O., Gay B.B., Naffis D. Intussusception of the appendix in children. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1976. 126 (6). Pp. 1164-1168.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>4. Chaar C.I., Waxelman B., Zuckerman K., Longo W. Intussueception of the appendix: a comprehensive review of the literature. The American Journal of Surgery. 2009. 198(1). Pp. 122-128.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>5. Chen Y.C., Chiang J.M. Appendiceal intussusception with adenocarcinoma mimicking a cecal polyp. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2000. 52(1). Pp. 130-131.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>6. Collins D.C. 71.000 human appendix specimens. A final report, summarizing forty years&amp;rsquo; study. American journal of Proctology. 1963. 14.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Pp. 265-281</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>7. Dunavant D., Wilson H. Intussusception of the appendix, with complete inversion of the appendix and protrusion from the anus. Annals of Surgery.1989.. 135(2). Pp. 287&amp;ndash;288.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>8. Gilpin D. Intussusception of the appendix. The Ulster Medical Journal. 1989. 58(52). Pp. 193-195.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>9. Fernandez-Rey C.L., Garcia C., Alvarez Blanco A.M. Appendicular mucocele as cause of intestinal intussusception: diagnostic by computer tomography. Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas. 2010. 102(10). Pp. 604-605.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>10. Fink V.H., Al S., Goldberg S.LIntussusception of the appendix. Case reports and reviews of the literature. American Journal of Gastroenterology.1964. . 42. Pp. 431&amp;ndash;4 41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>11. Jacobs R. Intussusception of the appendix. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1963. 89.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Pp. 620 -621.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>12. Jevon G.P., Daya D., Qizilbash A.H. Intussusception of the appendix: a report of four cases and review of the literature. Archives of Pathology &amp;amp; Laboratory Medicine. 1992. 116(9). Pp. 960&amp;ndash;964.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>13. Kim T.H., Jeon J.Y., Kim H.K., Choi Y.H., Baik G.H. Colonoscopic Diagnosis of Appendiceal Intussusception: A Case Report. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2005. 20(4). Pp.680-682.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>14. Komine N., Yasunaga C., Nakamoto M., Shima I., Iso Y., Takeda Y., Nakamata T. Intussusception of the appendix that reduced spontaneously during follow-up in a patient on hemodialysis therapy. Internal Medicine. 2004. 43(6). Pp. 479-483.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>15. McKidd J. Case of invagination of caecum and appendix. Edinburgh Medical Journal. 1858. 4. Pp.793&amp;ndash;797.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>16. Modern surgical pathology/ Weidner, Cote, Suster, Weiss. &amp;ndash; 2nd ed.-. Philadelfia, 2009. Vol 1. 851 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>17. Nycum L.R., Moss H., Adams J.Q., Macri C.I. Asymptomatic intussusceptions of the appendix due to endometriosis. Southern Medical Journal, 1999. 92. Pp. 524-525.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>18. Ozuner C., Davidson P., Church J. Intussusception of the vermiform appendix: preoperative colonoscopic diagnosis of two cases and review of the literature. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2000. 15(3). Pp. 185-187.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>19. Ryu B.Y., Kim T.H., Jeon J.Y., Kim H.K., Choi Y.H., Baik G.H. Colonoscopic Diagnosis of appendiceal Intussusception: A Case Report. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2005.20(4). Pp.680-682.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>20. Salehzadeh A., Scala A., Simson J.N.L. Appendiceal intussusceptions mistaken for a polyp at colonoscopy: case report and review of the literature. Annals of Royal College of Surgeons England. 2010. 92(6). Pp. 46-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>21. Seddik H., Rabhi M. Two cases of appendiceal intussusception : a rare diagnostic pitfall in colonoscopy. Diagnostic and Theraupetic Endoscopy 2011. Article ID 198984.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>22. Taban S., Dema A., Lazar D., Sporea I., Lazar E., Cornianu M. An unusual &amp;ldquo;tumor&amp;rdquo; of the cecum: the inverted appendiceal stump. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology. 2006. 47(2). Pp. 193-196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>23. VarsamisN., PouggourasK., SalveridisN., TheodosiouA., LostoridisE., KarageorgiouG., Mekakas A.,Christodoulidis K. Appendiceal intussusception URL: //https://www.google.com/url?q=http://cdn.intechweb.org/pdfs/25638.pdf. (date of access: May 7, 2017).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>24. Wang S.M., Huang F.C., Wu C.H., Ko S.F., Lee S.Y., Hsiao C.C. Ileocecal Burkit&amp;rsquo;s Lymphoma presenting as ileocolic intussusceptions with appendiceal invagination and acute appendicitis. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2010. 109(6). Pp. 476-479.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>