2658-6533Research Results in Biomedicine2658-653310.18413/2658-6533-2019-5-3-0-11747GeneticsThe applicability of interphase chromosome-specific multicolor banding (ICS-MCB) for studying neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disordersThe applicability of interphase chromosome-specific multicolor banding (ICS-MCB) for studying neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disordersIourovIvan Y.IourovIvan Y.ivan.iourov@gmail.comLiehrThomasLiehrThomasThomas.Liehr@med.uni-jena.deVorsanovaSvetlana G.VorsanovaSvetlana G.svorsanova@mail.ruMéndez-RosadoLuis A.Méndez-RosadoLuis A.albermen@infomed.sld.cuYurovYuri B.YurovYuri B.ivan.iourov@gmail.com20195300

Background: Interphase chromosome-specific multicolor banding (ICS-MCB) has been developed for studying whole chromosomes in interphase nuclei at any stage of the cell cycle at molecular resolution. Previously, important biomedical discoveries have been made using the technique. In the postgenomic era, a need appears to exist for a reevaluation of molecular cytogenetic techniques, including ICS-MCB, which seems to take a well-deserved place. Aim of the study: The aim of the present study is to address the applicability of ICS-MCB for studying neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Conclusions: A brief overview of previous ICS-MCB applications demonstrates that the technique may provide an appreciable amount of unique data on chromosome abnormalities and organization in interphase nuclei. Furthermore, the technique offers opportunities for evaluating these phenomena in the diseased human brain. Such opportunity seems to be critical for unraveling molecular and cellular mechanisms of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Therefore, we conclude that ICS-MCB may represent an important part of molecular and cellular studies of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders.

Background: Interphase chromosome-specific multicolor banding (ICS-MCB) has been developed for studying whole chromosomes in interphase nuclei at any stage of the cell cycle at molecular resolution. Previously, important biomedical discoveries have been made using the technique. In the postgenomic era, a need appears to exist for a reevaluation of molecular cytogenetic techniques, including ICS-MCB, which seems to take a well-deserved place. Aim of the study: The aim of the present study is to address the applicability of ICS-MCB for studying neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Conclusions: A brief overview of previous ICS-MCB applications demonstrates that the technique may provide an appreciable amount of unique data on chromosome abnormalities and organization in interphase nuclei. Furthermore, the technique offers opportunities for evaluating these phenomena in the diseased human brain. Such opportunity seems to be critical for unraveling molecular and cellular mechanisms of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Therefore, we conclude that ICS-MCB may represent an important part of molecular and cellular studies of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders.

chromosomechromosome instabilityinterphase nucleusneurodegenerative disordersneurodevelopmental disorderschromosomechromosome instabilityinterphase nucleusneurodegenerative disordersneurodevelopmental disorders

Ivan I. Iourov, Svetlana G. Vorsanova and Luis Alberto Mendez-Rosado are supported by RFBR and CITMA according to the research project №18–515-34005

Список литературыIourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB. Molecular cytogenetics and cytogenomics of brain diseases. Curr Genomics. 2008;9(7):452-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/138920208786241216Parikshak NN, Gandal MJ, Geschwind DH. Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16(8):441-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3934Yurov YB, Vorsanova SG, Iourov IY. Human Molecular Neurocytogenetics. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2018;6(4):155-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40142-018-0152-yWillsey AJ, Morris MT, Wang S, et al. The psychiatric cell map initiative: a convergent systems biological approach to illuminating key molecular pathways in neuropsychiatric disorders. Cell. 2018;174(3):505-520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.016Youssoufian H, Pyeritz RE. Human genetics and disease: Mechanisms and consequences of somatic mosaicism in humans. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3(10):748-758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg906Rohrback S, Siddoway B, Liu CS, et al. Genomic mosaicism in the developing and adult brain. DevNeurobiol. 2018;78(11):1026-1048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22626Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB, et al. Ontogenetic and pathogenetic views on somatic chromosomal mosaicism. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(5). pii: E379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10050379Speicher MR, Carter NP. The new cytogenetics: blurring the boundaries with molecular biology. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(10):782-792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1692Bakker B, van den Bos H, Lansdorp PM, et al. How to count chromosomes in a cell: An overview of current and novel technologies. BioEssays, 2015;37(5):570-577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201400218Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB, Iourov IY. Human interphase chromosomes: a review of available molecular cytogenetic technologies. MolCytogenet. 2010;3:1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-3-1.Levsky JM, Singer RH. Fluorescence in situ hybridization: past, present and future. J Cell Sci, 2003;116(Pt14):2833-2838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00633Yurov YB, Vorsanova SG, Iourov IY, et al. Unexplained autism is frequently associated with low-level mosaic aneuploidy. J Med Genet. 2007;44(8):521-525. DOI: https://doi.org/ https://jmg.bmj.com/content/44/8/521Ferguson-Smith MA. History and evolution of cytogenetics. MolCytogenet. 2015;8:19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0125-8Cheng L, Zhang S, Wang L, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization in surgical pathology: principles and applications. J PatholClin Res. 2017;3(2):73-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.64Ratan ZA, Zaman SB, Mehta V, et al. Application of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique for the detection of genetic aberration in medical science. Cureus. 2017;9(6):e1325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1325Iourov IY, Liehr T, Vorsanova SG, et al. Visualization of interphase chromosomes in postmitotic cells of the human brain by multicolour banding (MCB). Chromosome Res. 2006;14(3):223-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-006-1037-6Iourov IY, Liehr T, Vorsanova SG, et al. Interphase chromosome-specific multicolor banding (ICS-MCB): a new tool for analysis of interphase chromosomes in their integrity. Biomol Eng. 2007;24(4):415-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioeng.2007.05.003Riegel M. Human molecular cytogenetics: from cells to nucleotides. Genet Mol Biol. 2014;37(Suppl1):194-209.Arendt T, Mosch B, Morawski M. Neuronal aneuploidy in health and disease: a cytomic approach to understand the molecular individuality of neurons. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10(4):1609-1627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10041609Hochstenbach R, Buizer-Voskamp JE, Vorstman JA, et al. Genome arrays for the detection of copy number variations in idiopathic mental retardation, idiopathic generalized epilepsy and neuropsychiatric disorders: lessons for diagnostic workflow and research. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2011;135(3-4):174-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000332928Yurov YB, VorsanovaSG, Solov’ev IV, et al. Instability of chromosomes in human nerve cells (normal and with neuromental diseases). Russ. J. Genet. 2010;46(10):1194-1196. DOI:Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Liehr T, et al. Increased chromosome instability dramatically disrupts neural genome integrity and mediates cerebellar degeneration in the ataxia-telangiectasia brain. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(14):2656-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddp207Leija-Salazar M, Piette C, Proukakis C. Review: Somatic mutations in neurodegeneration. NeuropatholApplNeurobiol. 2018;44(3):267-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nan.12465Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Liehr T, et al. Aneuploidy in the normal, Alzheimer's disease and ataxia-telangiectasia brain: differential expression and pathological meaning. Neurobiol Dis. 2009;34(2):212-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2009.01.003Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB. Genomic landscape of the Alzheimer's disease brain: chromosome instability – aneuploidy, but not tetraploidy – mediates neurodegeneration. Neurodegener Dis. 2011;8(1-2):35-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000315398Yurov YB, Vorsanova SG, Liehr T, et al. X chromosome aneuploidy in the Alzheimer's disease brain. MolCytogenet. 2014;7(1):20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-7-20Nudelman KNH, McDonald BC, Lahiri DK, et al. Biological Hallmarks of Cancer in Alzheimer's Disease. MolNeurobiol. 2019:15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-019-1591-5Yurov YB, Vorsanova SG, Iourov IY. Ontogenetic variation of the human genome. Curr Genomics. 2010;11(6):420-425. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.2174/138920210793175958Zhang L, Vijg J. Somatic mutagenesis in mammals and its implications for human disease and aging. Annu Rev Genet. 2018;52:397-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-120417-031501Iourov I, Vorsanova S, Liehr T, et al. Chromothripsis as a mechanism driving genomic instability mediating brain diseases. MolCytogenet. 2017;10(Suppl 1):20.Horne SD, Chowdhury SK, Heng HH. Stress, genomic adaptation, and the evolutionary trade-off. Front. Genet. 2014;5:92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00092Hou Y, Song H, Croteau DL, et al. Genome instability in Alzheimer disease. Mech Ageing Dev. 2017;161(PtA):83-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2016.04.005Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB. Somatic cell genomics of brain disorders: a new opportunity to clarify genetic-environmental interactions. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013;139(3):181-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000347053