<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2658-6533</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Results in Biomedicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2658-6533</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2658-6533-2020-6-3-0-12</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2114</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Medicine (miscellaneous)</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Premature birth, modern realities&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Premature birth, modern realities&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Fomina</surname><given-names>Anna S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Fomina</surname><given-names>Anna S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>asfomina@mail.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/medicine/2020/3/document._сентябрь_2020._pdf-138-150_XE9y0ch.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Background:&amp;nbsp;Preterm birth is the main cause of neonatal and infant mortality, child morbidity and disability. The rate of premature birth, despite our knowledge of risk factors, pathogenetic mechanisms of formation and modern diagnostic capabilities, does not tend to decrease, occupying 6% of the total number of births in our country. The aim of the study:&amp;nbsp;The purpose of the research was to study the state of the problem of preterm birth on the basis of available literature data. Materials and methods:&amp;nbsp;The analysis of available national and foreign literature data concerning the problem of preterm birth over the past five years was carried out. PubMed, Elibrary, Scopus computer databases were used. Results:&amp;nbsp;There are many reasons leading to premature birth. However it is known for certain, that the main etiological factor leading to premature birth is the inflammatory process, in the vast majority of cases caused by opportunistic microflora. Our arsenal includes clinical, laboratory and instrumental methods that allow us to determine the presence of infection and take the necessary measures in time. It is difficult to diagnose and treat &amp;quot;sterile&amp;quot; intraamniotic inflammation, which is formed because of the lack of timely treatment of bacterial vaginosis and, to a lesser extent, vulvovaginal candidiasis, as well as asymptomatic bacteriuria. Conclusion:&amp;nbsp;Preterm birth is a leading medical and social problem that leads to high child morbidity, disability, and mortality, which negatively affects the psychoemotional health of not only a single family, but also the gene pool of the nation. The modern approach to pregnancy management is based on evidence-based medicine with clear implementation of clinical recommendations that allow to exclude the influence of controlled risk factors at the pregravidar stage and in the first trimester, to carry out timely diagnostic and therapeutic measures, and improve perinatal outcomes. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Background:&amp;nbsp;Preterm birth is the main cause of neonatal and infant mortality, child morbidity and disability. The rate of premature birth, despite our knowledge of risk factors, pathogenetic mechanisms of formation and modern diagnostic capabilities, does not tend to decrease, occupying 6% of the total number of births in our country. The aim of the study:&amp;nbsp;The purpose of the research was to study the state of the problem of preterm birth on the basis of available literature data. Materials and methods:&amp;nbsp;The analysis of available national and foreign literature data concerning the problem of preterm birth over the past five years was carried out. PubMed, Elibrary, Scopus computer databases were used. Results:&amp;nbsp;There are many reasons leading to premature birth. However it is known for certain, that the main etiological factor leading to premature birth is the inflammatory process, in the vast majority of cases caused by opportunistic microflora. Our arsenal includes clinical, laboratory and instrumental methods that allow us to determine the presence of infection and take the necessary measures in time. It is difficult to diagnose and treat &amp;quot;sterile&amp;quot; intraamniotic inflammation, which is formed because of the lack of timely treatment of bacterial vaginosis and, to a lesser extent, vulvovaginal candidiasis, as well as asymptomatic bacteriuria. Conclusion:&amp;nbsp;Preterm birth is a leading medical and social problem that leads to high child morbidity, disability, and mortality, which negatively affects the psychoemotional health of not only a single family, but also the gene pool of the nation. The modern approach to pregnancy management is based on evidence-based medicine with clear implementation of clinical recommendations that allow to exclude the influence of controlled risk factors at the pregravidar stage and in the first trimester, to carry out timely diagnostic and therapeutic measures, and improve perinatal outcomes. </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>premature birth</kwd><kwd>premature rupture of fetal membranes</kwd><kwd>infectious factor</kwd><kwd>chorioamnionitis</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>premature birth</kwd><kwd>premature rupture of fetal membranes</kwd><kwd>infectious factor</kwd><kwd>chorioamnionitis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Khodzhayeva ZS, Shmakov RG, Adamyan LV, et al., editors. Clinical recommendations: Premature birth. Moscow; 2020. Russian.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Ozalkaya E, Karatekin G, Topcuoğlu S, et al. Morbidity in preterm infants with fetal inflammatory response syndrome. Pediatrics International. 2016;58(9):850-864. DOI:&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.12895</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Dolgun ZN, Inan C, Altintas AS, et al. Preterm birth in twin pregnancies: Clinical outcomes and predictive parameters. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016;32(4):922-926. DOI:&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10409</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Di Renzo DC, Cabero Roura L, Facchinetti F, et al. Preterm labor and birth management: recommendations from the European Association of Perinatal Medicine. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2017;30(17):2011-2030. DOI:&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1323860</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Younge N, Goldstein RF, Bann CM, et al. Survival and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes among Periviable Infants. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;376(7):617-628. DOI:&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1605566</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Goisis A, Remes H, Martikainen P, et al. Medically assisted reproduction and birth outcomes: a within-family analysis using Finnish population registers. The Lancet. 2019;393(10177):1225-1232. DOI:&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31863-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Strauss JF, Romero R, Gomez-Lopez N, et al. Spontaneous preterm birth: advances toward the discovery of genetic predisposition. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;218(3):294-314. DOI:&amp;nbsp;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Saccone G, Perriera L, Berghella V. Prior uterine evacuation of pregnancy as independent risk factor for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;214(5):572-91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Boivin A, Luo ZC, Audibert F, et al. Risk for preterm and very preterm delivery in women who were born preterm. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;125(5):1177-1184. DOI:&amp;nbsp;http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000813</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Fuchs F, Monet B, Ducruet T, et al. Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth: A large cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>а OA, Ostromensky VV. Infectious factors in the genesis of miscarriage. Effective pharmacotherapy. 2019;15(13):26-33. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33978/2307-3586-2019-15-13-26-33</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Enkova EV, Khoperskaya ОV. The value of determining concentrations of calcidiol and vascular endothelial growth factor to predict non-developing pregnancy. Research Results in Biomedicine. 2018;4(4): 69-78. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8955-2018-4-4-0-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Khoperskaya O. Clinical, laboratory, and pathologic features of non-developing pregnancy [dissertation]. Voronezh; 2018. Russian.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Contini C, Rotondo JC, Magagnoli F, et al. Investigation on silent bacterial infections in specimens from pregnant women affected by spontaneous miscarriage. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2019;234(1):100-107. DOI:&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.26952</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014;345(6198):760-765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251816&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, et al. Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;213(4):29-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Vinturache AE, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Hwang J, et al. Maternal microbiome &amp;ndash; A pathway to preterm birth. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2016;21(2):94-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2016.02.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Panaitescu B, et al. Inflammasome activation during spontaneous preterm labor with intra-amniotic infection or sterile intra-amniotic inflammation. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2018;80(5):e13049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.13049</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Keelan JA. Intrauterine inflammatory activation, functional progesterone withdrawal, and the timing of term and preterm birth. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2018;125:89-99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2017.12.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Strizhakov AN, Belousova VS, Svitich OA. Clinical significance of Toll-like receptors in the pathogenesis of preterm birth. Gynecology, obstetrics and perinatology. 2016;15(1):35-40. Russian. DOI:&amp;nbsp;http://dx.doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2016-1-35-40</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Ashford KB, Chavan NR, Wiggins AT, et al. Comparison of Serum and Cervical Cytokine Levels throughout Pregnancy between Preterm and Term Births.&amp;nbsp;AJP Reports. 2018;8(2):e113-e120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1656534</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Myers KM, Fetlovich H, Mazza E, et al. The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy. Journal of Biomechanics. 2015;48(9):1511-1523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Belousova VS, Strizhakov AN, Svitich OA, et al. Preterm birth: causes, pathogenesis, tactics. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020;2:82-87. Russian. DOIhttps://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.2.82-87</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Romero R, Miranda J, Kusanovic JP, et al. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term I: microbiology of the amniotic cavity using cultivation and molecular techniques. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2015;43(1):19-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2014-0249</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Xu Y, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in the amniotic cavity of women with intra-amniotic infection: a new mechanism of host defense. Reproductive Sciences. 2017:24(8):1139-1153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719116678690</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Romero R, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Sterile intra-amniotic inflammation in asymptomatic patients with a sonographic short cervix: prevalence and clinical significance. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2015;28(11):1343-1359. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2014.954243</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Oh KJ, Kim SM, Hong JS et al. Twenty-four percent of patients with clinical chorioamnionitis in preterm gestations have no evidence of either culture-proven intraamniotic infection or intraamniotic inflammation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;216(6):604.e1-604.e11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Kusanovic JP, Romero R, Martinovic C, et al. Transabdominal collection of amniotic fluid &amp;ldquo;sludge&amp;rdquo; and identification of Candida albicans intraamniotic infection. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2018;31(10):1279-1284. DOI:&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1315095</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Paules C, Moreno E, Gonzales A, et al. Amniotic fluid sludge as a marker of intra-amniotic infection and histological chorioamnionitis in cervical insufficiency: a report of four cases and literature review. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2016;29(16):2681-2684. DOI:&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1101445</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Hatanaka AR, Mattar R, Kawanami TE, et al. Amniotic fluid &amp;ldquo;sludge&amp;rdquo; is an independent risk factor for preterm delivery. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2016;29(1):120-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2014.989202</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Pustotina OA. Amniotic fluid sludge. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2018;(7):64-73. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-7-64-73</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Boyle AK, Rinaldi SF, Norman JE, et al. Preterm birth: Inflammation, fetal injury and treatment strategies. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2017;119:62-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2016.11.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Whitworth M, Bricker L, Mullan C. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015;(7):CD007058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007058.pub3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Adanir I, Ozyuncu O, Gokmen Karasu AF, et al. Amniotic fluid &amp;ldquo;sludge&amp;rdquo;; prevalence and clinical significance of it in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2018;31(2):135-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1277700</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Espin MS, Elovitz MA, Iams JD, et al. Predictive Accuracy of Serial Transvaginal Cervical Lengths and Quantitative Vaginal Fetal Fibronectin Levels for Spontaneous Preterm Birth Among Nulliparous Women. JAMA &amp;ndash; Journal of the American Medical Association. 2017;317(10):1047-1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.1373</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Ravi M, Beljorie M, El Masry K. Evaluation of the quantitative fetal fibronectin test and PAMG-1 test for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of preterm labor. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2019;32(23):3909-3914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1476485</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Liong S, Di Quinzio MKW, Fleming G, et al. New biomarkers for the prediction of spontaneous preterm labour in symptomatic pregnant women: a comparison with fetal fibronectin. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2015;122(3):370-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12993</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>Gorina KA, Khodzhaeva ZS, Belousov DM, et al. Premature birth: past restrictions and new opportunities. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020;1:12-19. Russian. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.1.12-119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><mixed-citation>Norman M, Piedvache A, B&amp;oslash;rch K, et al. Association of Short Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration-to-Birth Intervals With Survival and Morbidity Among Very Preterm Infants: Results From the EPICE Cohort. JAMA Pediatrics. 2017;171(7):678-686. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0602</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><mixed-citation>Kempen LM, Teeffelen AS, de Ruigh AA, et al. Amnioinfusion Compared With No Intervention in Women With Second-Trimester Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;133(1):129‐136. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><mixed-citation>Quist-Nelson J, de Ruigh AA, Seidler AL, et al. Immediate Delivery Compared With Expectant Management in Late Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;131(2):269‐279. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002447</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><mixed-citation>Langen ES, Sit A, Sherwin K, et al. A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of 17 Alpha-hydroxyprogesterone Caproate in the Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. American Journal of Perinatology. 2018;35(8):779‐784. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1617428</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><mixed-citation>Lee JH, Romero R, Kim SM, et al. A new antibiotic regimen treats and prevents intra-amniotic infection/inflammation in patients with preterm PROM. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2016;29(17):2727-2737. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.508</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><mixed-citation>Navathe R, Schoen CN, Heidari P, et al. Azithromycin vs erythromycin for the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes.&amp;nbsp;American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;221(2):141‐148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><mixed-citation>Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, Da Fonseca E, et al. Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;218(2):161-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.576</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><mixed-citation>Romero R, Nicolaides KH, Conde-Agudelo A, et al. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth &amp;le; 34 weeks of gestation in women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis including data from the OPPTIMUM study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;48(3):308-317. DOI:&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15953&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>