2658-6533Research Results in Biomedicine2658-653310.18413/2658-6533-2021-7-4-0-102588Medicine (miscellaneous)<strong>Allostatic load as a method of objectification of age-related viability of patients with ophthalmopathology</strong><br /> &nbsp;<strong>Allostatic load as a method of objectification of age-related viability of patients with ophthalmopathology</strong><br /> &nbsp;FabrikantovOleg L.FabrikantovOleg L.mntk@mntk-tambov.ruAgarkovNikolai M.AgarkovNikolai M.vitalaxen@mail.ruLevInna V.LevInna V.michina.inna@mail.ruGorkoTatyana S.GorkoTatyana S.mntk@mntk-tambov.ruYablokovMaxim M.YablokovMaxim M.vitalaxen@mail.ruMoskalevaElena O.MoskalevaElena O.vitalaxen@mail.ruMoskalevAlexander A.MoskalevAlexander A.vitalaxen@mail.ru20217400

Background:&nbsp;In recent years, the elderly have seen an increase in the prevalence of combined ophthalmic diseases that change their functional activity in everyday life and society. In gerontological practice, tests and scales that differ significantly in the subjective perception of patients are mainly used to assess age-related viability. Allostatic load, which is an objective reflection of age-related viability, has not been practically studied in patients of older age groups in the presence of ophthalmic diseases. The aim of the study:&nbsp;To analyze the age-related viability in elderly patients with ophthalmic pathology based on allostatic load. Materials and methods:&nbsp;The study of age-related viability was conducted in the Tambov Branch of the Academician S.N. Fedorov Eye Microsurgery in 2018-2020 in 45 60-74-year-old patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma, 52 60-74-year-old patients with diabetic retinopathy, and 68 60-74-year-old patients with combined angle-closure glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. To assess the age-related viability, the allostatic load was determined by a set of indicators: body mass index, blood content of C-reactive protein, homocysteine, total cholesterol, triglycerides, blood albumin level, glomerular filtration rate, diastolic and systolic blood pressure. Results:&nbsp;There are significant differences in the indicators of allostatic load in elderly patients with comorbid ophthalmic pathology, compared with the control. In comorbid primary angle-closure glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy, the allostatic load is 3.4&plusmn;0.3 points, which is statistically significantly higher than in patients of the same age with primary angle-closure glaucoma (1.8&plusmn;0.2 points) and diabetic retinopathy (2.4&plusmn;0.2 points). All components of allostatic load in patients aged 60-74 years with combined primary angle-closure glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy differ significantly and have deviations from the reference values, with the exception of glomerular filtration rate. The level of albumins is 51.2&plusmn;0.8% vs. 57.8&plusmn;0.6 in primary angle-closure glaucoma, body mass index 28.8&plusmn;0.5 kg / m2 vs. 24.7&plusmn;0.3 kg / m2, C-reactive protein 13.1&plusmn;0.3 mg / l vs. 6.7&plusmn;0.2 mg / L, glycated hemoglobin 6.8&plusmn;0.4 % vs. 4.1&plusmn;0.2 %, systolic blood pressure 151.6&plusmn;2.0 mmHg vs. 142.8&plusmn;1.9 mmHg. Conclusion:&nbsp;Allostatic load in elderly patients with ophthalmic diseases can serve as an objective method for assessing the age-related viability of elderly patients with visual organ pathology.

Background:&nbsp;In recent years, the elderly have seen an increase in the prevalence of combined ophthalmic diseases that change their functional activity in everyday life and society. In gerontological practice, tests and scales that differ significantly in the subjective perception of patients are mainly used to assess age-related viability. Allostatic load, which is an objective reflection of age-related viability, has not been practically studied in patients of older age groups in the presence of ophthalmic diseases. The aim of the study:&nbsp;To analyze the age-related viability in elderly patients with ophthalmic pathology based on allostatic load. Materials and methods:&nbsp;The study of age-related viability was conducted in the Tambov Branch of the Academician S.N. Fedorov Eye Microsurgery in 2018-2020 in 45 60-74-year-old patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma, 52 60-74-year-old patients with diabetic retinopathy, and 68 60-74-year-old patients with combined angle-closure glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. To assess the age-related viability, the allostatic load was determined by a set of indicators: body mass index, blood content of C-reactive protein, homocysteine, total cholesterol, triglycerides, blood albumin level, glomerular filtration rate, diastolic and systolic blood pressure. Results:&nbsp;There are significant differences in the indicators of allostatic load in elderly patients with comorbid ophthalmic pathology, compared with the control. In comorbid primary angle-closure glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy, the allostatic load is 3.4&plusmn;0.3 points, which is statistically significantly higher than in patients of the same age with primary angle-closure glaucoma (1.8&plusmn;0.2 points) and diabetic retinopathy (2.4&plusmn;0.2 points). All components of allostatic load in patients aged 60-74 years with combined primary angle-closure glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy differ significantly and have deviations from the reference values, with the exception of glomerular filtration rate. The level of albumins is 51.2&plusmn;0.8% vs. 57.8&plusmn;0.6 in primary angle-closure glaucoma, body mass index 28.8&plusmn;0.5 kg / m2 vs. 24.7&plusmn;0.3 kg / m2, C-reactive protein 13.1&plusmn;0.3 mg / l vs. 6.7&plusmn;0.2 mg / L, glycated hemoglobin 6.8&plusmn;0.4 % vs. 4.1&plusmn;0.2 %, systolic blood pressure 151.6&plusmn;2.0 mmHg vs. 142.8&plusmn;1.9 mmHg. Conclusion:&nbsp;Allostatic load in elderly patients with ophthalmic diseases can serve as an objective method for assessing the age-related viability of elderly patients with visual organ pathology.

allostatic loadresilienceelderlyophthalmological diseasesallostatic loadresilienceelderlyophthalmological diseasesСписок литературыBurton MJ, Ramke J, Marques AP, et al. The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020. The Lancet Global Health. 2021;9(4):e489-e551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30488-5Rono HK, Macleod D, Bastawrous A, et al. Utilization of Secondary Eye Care Services in Western Kenya. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(18):3371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183371Ramke J, Kyari F, Mwangi N, et al. Cataract Services are Leaving Widows Behind: Examples from National Cross-Sectional Surveys in Nigeria and Sri Lanka. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(20):3854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203854Reddy PA, Congdon N, MacKenzie G, et al. Effect of providing near glasses on productivity among rural Indian tea workers with presbyopia (PROSPER): a randomised trial. The Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(9):e1019-e1027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30329-2Glick P, Luoto J, Orrs MS, et al. The individual and household impacts of cataract surgery on older blind adults in Ethiopia. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 2019;26(1):7-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2018.1504310Assi L, Rosman L, Chamseddine F, et al. Eye health and quality of life: an umbrella review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e037648. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037648Luo Y, He P, Guo C, et al. Association between sensory impairment and dementia in older adults: evidence from China.&nbsp; 2018;:480-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15202Flaxman SR, Bourne RA, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis The Lancet Global Health.&nbsp;2017;5(12):e1221-e1234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5D&rsquo;Amico DJ. Observations on Ophthalmic Care and Surgery for Very Important People. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2020;138(10):1015-1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2971Davidyan OV, Myasnaya MV, Selyutina MV, et al. Resilience in retired people. Current problems of health care and medical statistics. 2020;3:481-491. DOI:&nbsp;https://doi.org/10.24411/2312-2935-2020-00088Calabrese EJ, Kozumbo WJ. The phytoprotective agent sulforaphane prevents inflammatory degenerative diseases and age-related pathologies via Nrf2-mediated hormesis. Pharmacological Research. 2021;163:105283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105283Shiels PG, Buchanan S, Selman C, et al. Allostatic load and ageing: linking the microbiome and nutrition with age-related health. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2019;47(4):1165-1172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20190110Weiss SJ, Kovacs K, Gonzales-Gonzales LA, et al. The Expanded Clinical Spectrum of Coxsackie Retinopathy. Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2020;51(9):529-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20200831-08Sun HJ, Jin XM, Xu J, et al. Baicalin Alleviates Age-Related Macular Degeneration via miR-223/NLRP3-Regulated Pyroptosis. Pharmacology. 2020;105(1-2):28-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000502614Egorov EA, Erichev VP. National guide to glaucoma for practicing physicians. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2019.Solomon SD, Chew E, Duh EJ, et al. Diabetic Retinopathy: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(3):412-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2641Zheng DD, Christ SL, Lam BL, et al. Visual acuity and increased mortality: the role of allostatic load and functional status. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2014;55(8):5144-5150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14202Sanna R, Napoli PE, Iovino C, et al. Resolution of pinguecula-related dry eye disease after argon laser photocoagulation. International Medical Case Reports Journal. 2017;10:247-250. https://doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S138786Guidi J, Lucente M, Sonino N, et al. Allostatic Load and Its Impact on Health: A Systematic Review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 2021;90(1):11-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000510696Mathew A, Doorenbos AZ, Li H. Allostatic Load in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Mini Meta-Analysis. Biological Research For Nursing. 2021;23(3):341-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800420969898