2658-6533Research Results in Biomedicine2658-653310.18413/2658-6533-2022-8-4-0-72897Medicine (miscellaneous)<strong>Coexistence of Urinary Incontinence and Osteoporosis in Females &ndash; A Systematic Review</strong><strong>Coexistence of Urinary Incontinence and Osteoporosis in Females &ndash; A Systematic Review</strong>PandaSougataPandaSougatasougataphysio@gmail.comBaliSevekaBaliSevekasevekaphysio@gmail.comP. S. SoodAmritP. S. SoodAmritamritphysio@gmail.comSinghalVisheshSinghalVisheshvisheshsinghal2@gmail.com20228400

Background:&nbsp;Urinary incontinence (UI) is described as the involuntary leakage of urine and is a global problem. The younger age groups have the lowest prevalence (12.0%), while the oldest have the greatest (40.0%); however, there is a surge around the middle age. Osteoporosis (OP) is a medical and socioeconomic hazard characterized by the decrease of bone mass, strength throughout the body resulting in lower bone density and a higher risk of fractures. Females become more vulnerable to these conditions as they grow older. The aim of the study:&nbsp;To assess the available research and find links between coexistence of decreased bone health and urinary incontinence in females. Materials and methods:&nbsp;Electronic databases like, CINAHL, Embase, Trip Medical Database, Cochrane Library and Pub Med were the ones searched for relevant articles from January 2011 to January 2022. The PRISMA Statement for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis was used to conduct this systematic review. Results:&nbsp;There were 416 results found in the databases after eliminating the duplicates and studies that were unrelated to the topic. The review included total of five studies and quality assessment was done by four reviewers.&nbsp;Most studies found a strongly significant link between osteoporosis and urinary incontinence, whereas one study found no association. Conclusion:&nbsp;In this study, the five most common associated risk factors were revealed to be menopause, obesity, smoking, physical inactivity, and hyperlipidemia. Based on recent studies a strong significant link was found between the two health conditions (OP and UI) and coexistence of both conditions was seen in females.

Background:&nbsp;Urinary incontinence (UI) is described as the involuntary leakage of urine and is a global problem. The younger age groups have the lowest prevalence (12.0%), while the oldest have the greatest (40.0%); however, there is a surge around the middle age. Osteoporosis (OP) is a medical and socioeconomic hazard characterized by the decrease of bone mass, strength throughout the body resulting in lower bone density and a higher risk of fractures. Females become more vulnerable to these conditions as they grow older. The aim of the study:&nbsp;To assess the available research and find links between coexistence of decreased bone health and urinary incontinence in females. Materials and methods:&nbsp;Electronic databases like, CINAHL, Embase, Trip Medical Database, Cochrane Library and Pub Med were the ones searched for relevant articles from January 2011 to January 2022. The PRISMA Statement for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis was used to conduct this systematic review. Results:&nbsp;There were 416 results found in the databases after eliminating the duplicates and studies that were unrelated to the topic. The review included total of five studies and quality assessment was done by four reviewers.&nbsp;Most studies found a strongly significant link between osteoporosis and urinary incontinence, whereas one study found no association. Conclusion:&nbsp;In this study, the five most common associated risk factors were revealed to be menopause, obesity, smoking, physical inactivity, and hyperlipidemia. Based on recent studies a strong significant link was found between the two health conditions (OP and UI) and coexistence of both conditions was seen in females.

urinary incontinenceosteoporosisbone density disorderurine dysfunctionurinary incontinenceosteoporosisbone density disorderurine dysfunctionСписок литературыNguyen KD, Bagheri B, Bagheri H. Drug-induced bone loss: a major safety concern in Europe. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. 2018;17(10):1005-1014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2018.1524868Schapira D, Schapira C. Osteoporosis: The evolution of a scientific term. Osteoporosis International. 1992;2(4):164-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623921Catalano A, Martino G, Morabito N, et al. Pain in Osteoporosis: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Approach. Drugs and Aging. 2017;34(10):755-765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-017-0492-4Glaser DL, Kaplan FS. Osteoporosis. Definition and clinical presentation. Spine. 1997;22(24):12S-16S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199712151-00003Almousa S, van Loon AB. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in nulliparous adolescent and middle-aged women and the associated risk factors: A systematic review. Maturitas. 2018;107:78-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.10.003Wyndaele M, Hashim H. Pathophysiology of urinary incontinence. Surgery. 2017;35(6):287-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MPSUR.2017.03.002Fuselier A, Hanberry J, Margaret Lovin J, et al. Obesity and Stress Urinary Incontinence: Impact on Pathophysiology and Treatment. Current Urology Reports. 2018;19(1):10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0762-7Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, et al. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Tr&oslash;ndelag. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000;53(11):1150-1157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00232-8Nazzal Z, Khatib B, Al-Quqa B, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence amongst Palestinian women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study. Arab Journal of Urology. 2020;18(1):34-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1699340Berecki-Gisolf J, Spallek M, Hockey R, et al. Height loss in elderly women is preceded by osteoporosis and is associated with digestive problems and urinary incontinence. Osteoporosis International. 2010;21(3):479-485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0987-xSran M, Mercier J, Wilson P, et al. Physical therapy for urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or low bone density: a randomized controlled trial. Menopause. 2016;23(3):286-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000594Wei MC, Chou YH, Yang YS, et al. Osteoporosis and Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A National Health Insurance Database Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(12):4449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124449Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62(10):e1-e34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006Loney PL, Chambers LW, Bennett KJ, et al. Critical appraisal of the health research literature: prevalence or incidence of a health problem. Chronic Diseases in Canada. 1998;19(4):170-176.Meyer I, Morgan SL, Markland AD, et al. Pelvic floor disorder symptoms and bone strength in postmenopausal women. International Urogynecology Journal. 2020;31(9):1777-1784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04254-zMoon JH, Oh YH, Kong MH, et al. Association between urinary incontinence and bone health in Korean elderly women based on data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Electronic Journal of General Medicine. 2019;16(3):em140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/99586Richter HE, Morgan SL, Gleason JL, et al. Pelvic Floor Symptoms and Bone Mineral Density in Women Undergoing Osteoporosis Evaluation. International Urogynecology Journal. 2013;24(10):1663-1669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2056-4Berk E, Baykara S. Urinary incontinence severity, depression and anxiety relation in osteoporosis patients. Turkish Journal of Osteoporosis. 2020;26(1):30-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4274/TOD.GALENOS.2019.99266Murphy E, Bresnihan B, FitzGerald O. Validated measurement of periarticular bone mineral density at the knee joint by dual energy x ray absorptiometry. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2001;60:8-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ARD.60.1.8Choi YJ, Ock SY, Chung YS. Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) and TBS-Adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment Tool are Potential Supplementary Tools for the Discrimination of Morphometric Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 2016;19(4):507-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2016.04.001Clausen J, Gimbel H, Arenholt LTS, et al. Validity and reliability of two Danish versions of the ICIQ-UI SF. International Urogynecology Journal. 2021;32(12):3223-3233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04712-2Khan MJ, Omar MA, Laniado M. Diagnostic agreement of the 3 Incontinence Questionnaire to video-urodynamics findings in women with urinary incontinence: Department of Urology, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust Wexham Park Hospital Slough, Berkshire, United Kingdom. Central European Journal of Urology. 2018;71(1):84-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5173/CEJU.2018.1622Sandvik H, Espuna M, Hunskaar S. Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests. International Urogynecology Journal. 2006;17(5):520-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-0060-z