<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2658-6533</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Results in Biomedicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2658-6533</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2658-6533-2025-11-3-0-2</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3848</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Genetics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the frequency and spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities in abortions in early pregnancy failure&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the frequency and spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities in abortions in early pregnancy failure&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Neronova</surname><given-names>Elizaveta G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Neronova</surname><given-names>Elizaveta G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>neliner@yandex.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Vasilissa A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Vasilissa A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>vasilissalee@gmail.com</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/medicine/2025/3/Биомедисследования_3-22-37.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Background: The adverse effects of COVID-19 have affected the condition of various human organs and systems, including the reproductive system; in this regard, the assessment of the negative effects of COVID-19 on reproduction has become the subject of scientific research. The aim of the study: To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the genetic processes of early human embryonic development. Materials and methods: Fluorescence in situ hybridisation with centromeric and locus-specific probes for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22 was performed on interphase cells from 1408 abortions in early pregnancy failure. The frequency and spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities in samples obtained before the COVID-19 pandemic and during the pandemic period were determined. Results: The frequency of abortus with chromosomal abnormalities during the pandemic corresponds to pre-pandemic values. Changes in the number of abortuses with different types of chromosomal abnormalities were observed, but these changes did not reach statistically significant levels before or during the pandemic for most of the abnormalities studied. However, a statistically significant increase in the frequency of abortuses with trisomy of chromosome 22 was found during this period of the pandemic. The analysis showed that there was an increase in the number of patients over 36 years of age. This was the reason for the increase in the number of embryos with this type of pathology. The results obtained suggest a change in the reproductive intentions of different age groups in the population. This has led to an increase in patients over the age of 36 and an increase in the frequency of chromosomally abnormal embryos. During the pandemic, a shift in the sex ratio of embryos was also detected: the number of female abortuses increased, as did the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in this sex. Conclusion: COVID-19 and the pandemic of COVID-19 did not increase the total frequency of chromosomal abnormalities during early human embryogenesis but results demonstrate changes in the spectrum of detectable genetic pathology due to the age of the patients. Further research in this area is needed to better understand the impact of both the virus and the social manifestations of the COVID-19 pandemic on genetic processes that may lead to an increased mutation burden in human populations</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Background: The adverse effects of COVID-19 have affected the condition of various human organs and systems, including the reproductive system; in this regard, the assessment of the negative effects of COVID-19 on reproduction has become the subject of scientific research. The aim of the study: To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the genetic processes of early human embryonic development. Materials and methods: Fluorescence in situ hybridisation with centromeric and locus-specific probes for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22 was performed on interphase cells from 1408 abortions in early pregnancy failure. The frequency and spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities in samples obtained before the COVID-19 pandemic and during the pandemic period were determined. Results: The frequency of abortus with chromosomal abnormalities during the pandemic corresponds to pre-pandemic values. Changes in the number of abortuses with different types of chromosomal abnormalities were observed, but these changes did not reach statistically significant levels before or during the pandemic for most of the abnormalities studied. However, a statistically significant increase in the frequency of abortuses with trisomy of chromosome 22 was found during this period of the pandemic. The analysis showed that there was an increase in the number of patients over 36 years of age. This was the reason for the increase in the number of embryos with this type of pathology. The results obtained suggest a change in the reproductive intentions of different age groups in the population. This has led to an increase in patients over the age of 36 and an increase in the frequency of chromosomally abnormal embryos. During the pandemic, a shift in the sex ratio of embryos was also detected: the number of female abortuses increased, as did the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in this sex. Conclusion: COVID-19 and the pandemic of COVID-19 did not increase the total frequency of chromosomal abnormalities during early human embryogenesis but results demonstrate changes in the spectrum of detectable genetic pathology due to the age of the patients. Further research in this area is needed to better understand the impact of both the virus and the social manifestations of the COVID-19 pandemic on genetic processes that may lead to an increased mutation burden in human populations</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>COVID-19 pandemic</kwd><kwd>early pregnancy failure</kwd><kwd>abortus</kwd><kwd>chromosomal abnormalities</kwd><kwd>mutation burden</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>COVID-19 pandemic</kwd><kwd>early pregnancy failure</kwd><kwd>abortus</kwd><kwd>chromosomal abnormalities</kwd><kwd>mutation burden</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>WHO Director-General&amp;#39;s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020 [Internet] [cited 2025 Feb 4]. Russian. Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>&amp;laquo;World Health Organization&amp;raquo; Coronavirus (COVID-19) [Internet] [cited 2025 Feb 4]. Russian. Available from: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases?n=c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Number of COVID-19 deaths reported to WHO (cumulative total) [Internet] [cited 2025 Feb 4]. Available from: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/deaths?n=c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Baklaushev VP, Kulemzin SV, Gorchakov АА, et al. COVID-19. Etiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment. Journal of Clinical Practice. 2020;11(1):7-20. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/clinpract26339</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Chen H, Guo J, Wang C, et al. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records. The Lancet. 2020;395(10226):809-815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Dong L, Tian J, He S, et al. Possible vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from an infected mother to her newborn. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1846-1848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4621</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Kazemi SN, Hajikhani B, Didar H, et al. COVID-19 and cause of pregnancy loss during the pandemic: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0255994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255994</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Jamieson DJ, Rasmussen SA. An update on COVID-19 and pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022;226(2):177-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Ellington S, Strid P, Tong VT, et al. Characteristics of women of reproductive age with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by pregnancy status. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2020;69(25):769-775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6925a1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Fei Y, Tang N, Liu H, et al. Coagulation dysfunction a hallmark in COVID-19. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2020;144(10):1223-1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2020-0324-SA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Levi M, Thachil J, Iba T, et al. Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19. The Lancet Haematology. 2020;7(6):438-440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30145-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Luxi N, Giovanazzi A, Capuano A, et al. Ilmiovaccino COVID19 collaborating group. COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, paediatrics, immunocompromised patients, and persons with history of allergy or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection: overview of current recommendations and pre- and post-marketing evidence for vaccine efficacy and safety. Drug Safety. 2021;44(12):1247-1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-021-01131-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Shook LL, Kishkovich TP, Edlow AG. Countering COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in pregnancy: the &amp;quot;4 Cs&amp;quot;. American Journal of Perinatology. 2022;39(10):1048-1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1673-5546</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>National Health Service. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, fertility and coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination [Internet] [cited 2025 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-vaccination/pregnancy-breastfeeding-fertility-and-coronavirus-covid-19-vaccination/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Kharbanda EO, Haapala J, DeSilva M, et al. Spontaneous abortion following COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. JAMA. 2021;326(16):1629-1631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.15494</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Fern&amp;aacute;ndez-Garc&amp;iacute;a S, Del Campo-Albendea L, Sambamoorthi D, et al. PregCOV-19 Living Systematic Review Consortium. Effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Global Health. 2024;9(4):e014247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014247</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Oliveira JA, da Silva EG, Karasu AFG, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes of mRNA versus Non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. 2024;46:e-rbgo69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo69</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Du T, Zhang Y, Zha X, et al. Association of SARS-CoV-2 infection during late pregnancy with maternal and neonatal outcomes. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2024;24(1):632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06816-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Nilsson HP, R&amp;oslash;the EB, et al. Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2024;103(5):786-798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14764</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Xie Y, Mirzaei M, Kahrizi MS, et al. SARS-CoV-2 effects on sperm parameters: a meta-analysis study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2022;39(7):1555-1563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02540-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Zhang QF, Zhang YJ, Wang S, et al. Does COVID-19 affect sperm quality in males? the answer may be yes, but only temporarily. Virology Journal. 2024;21(1):24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-024-02290-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Ma L, Yao Y, Zhang Z, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection negatively impacts on the quality of embryos by delaying early embryonic development. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2024;91(3):e13831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.13831</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Tian F, Li S, Li N, et al. Association of SARS-CoV-2 infection during controlled ovarian stimulation with oocyte- and embryo-related outcomes. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6(7):e2323219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23219</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Dolgushina NV, Ermakova DM, Lomova NA, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022;10:115-122. Russian. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.10.115-122</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Liе Y, Zhao Q, Ma S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection is detrimental to pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI: a prospective cohort study. BMC Medicine. 2024;22(1):124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03336-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Grand RJ. SARS-CoV-2 and the DNA damage response. Journal of General Virology. 2023;104(11):1918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001918</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>P&amp;aacute;nico P, Ostrosky-Wegman P, Salazar AM. The potential role of COVID-19 in the induction of DNA damage. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research. 2022;789:108411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2022.108411</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>SARS-CoV-2 causes DNA damage, cellular senescence and inflammation. Nature Cell Biology. 2023;25:526-527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-023-01097-w</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Dobrokhotova YuE, Kuznetsov PA, Dzhokhadze LS. Current discourse on recurrent pregnancy loss (ESHRE Protocol 2023, National Clinical Guidelines &amp;quot;Recurrent Pregnancy Loss&amp;quot; 2021, materials of the World Congress of ESHRE 2023). Russian Journal of Woman and Child Health. 2023;6(3):219-225. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32364/2618-8430-2023-6-3-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Bektemirova DR, Romanova ZhV, Duschpanova AT. Non-developing pregnancy: main abortive causes. (literature review). Vestnik KAZNMU. 2021;2:25-32. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53065/KAZNMU.2021.93.53.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Khamoshina MB, Ismailova A, Ramazanova FU, et al. Early reproductive loss and COVID-19: realities and prospects. Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training. 2021;9(3):43-47. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/2303-9698-2021-9-3suppl-43-47</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Baranov VS, Kuznetsova TV. Cytogenetics of human embryonic development: Scientific and practical aspects. St Petersburg: N-L Publishing House; 2006. Russian.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Smits MAJ, van Maarle M, Hamer G, et al. Cytogenetic testing of pregnancy loss tissue, a meta-analysis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2020;40(6):867-879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.02.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Bell KA, Van Deerlin PG, Haddad BR, et al. Cytogenetic diagnosis of &amp;lsquo;&amp;lsquo;normal 46 XX&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading. Fertility and Sterility. 1999;71(2):334-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00445-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Lomax B, Tang S, Separovic E, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2000;66(5):1516-1521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/302878</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Shearer BM, Thorland EC, Carlson AW, et al. Reflex fluorescent in situ hybridization testing for unsuccessful product of conception cultures: A retrospective analysis of 5555 samples attempted by conventional cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Genetics in Medicine. 2011;13(6):545-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e31820c685b</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Sahoo T, Dzidic N, Strecker MN, et al. Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges. Genetics in Medicine. 2017;19(1):83-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.69</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>Chiryaeva OG, Petrova LI, Sadik NA, et al. Direct cytogenetic study of chorionic samples from the arrested pregnancy tissues. Journal of Obstetrics and Women&amp;#39;s Diseases. 2007;56(1):35-45. Russian.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><mixed-citation>van den Berg MMJ, van Maarle MC, van Wely M, et al. Genetics of early miscarriage. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 2012;1822(12):1951-1959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.07.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><mixed-citation>Nikitina TV, Lebedev IN. Cytogenetics of recurrent pregnancy loss. Russian Journal of Genetics. 2014;50(5):501-514. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S001667581402012X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><mixed-citation>Evdokimova VN, Nikitina TV, Lebedev IN, et al. Sex ratio in early embryonal mortality in man. Ontogenez. 2000;31(4):251-257.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><mixed-citation>Nikitina TV, Lebedev IN, Sukhanova NN, et al. A mathematical model for evaluation of maternal cell contamination in cultured cells from spontaneous abortions: significance for cytogenetic analysis of prenatal selection factors. Fertility and Sterility. 2005;83(4):964-972. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><mixed-citation>Hassold T, Benham F, Leppert M. Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of sex-chromosome monosomy. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1988;42(4):534-541.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><mixed-citation>Segawa T, Kuroda T, Kato K, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of the retained products of conception after missed abortion following blastocyst transfer: a retrospective, large-scale, single-centre study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2017;34(2):203-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.11.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><mixed-citation>Rodrigo L. Sperm genetic abnormalities and their contribution to embryo aneuploidy and miscarriage. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2020;34(6):101477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2020.101477</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><mixed-citation>Wang S, Zhang A, Pan Y, et al. Association between COVID-19 and male fertility: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. World Journal of Men&amp;#39;s Health. 2023;41(2):311-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.220091</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><mixed-citation>47 Stark J, Kuster SP, Hungerb&amp;uuml;hler V. Impact of COVID-19 disease on the male factor in reproductive medicine - how-to advise couples undergoing IVF/ICSI. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 2024;36:RD23205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/RD23205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><mixed-citation>Kaarouch I, Bouamoud N, Louanjli N, et al. Impact of sperm genome decay on Day-3 embryo chromosomal abnormalities from advanced-maternal-age patients. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2015;82(10):809-819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22526</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><mixed-citation>Kaarouch I, Bouamoud N, Madkour A, et al. Paternal age: Negative impact on sperm genome decays and IVF outcomes after 40 years. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2018;85(3):271-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22963</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><mixed-citation>Frederiksen LE, &amp;Oslash;lgaard SM, Roos L, et al. Maternal age and the risk of fetal aneuploidy: A nationwide cohort study of more than 500 000 singleton pregnancies in Denmark from 2008 to 2017. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2024;103(2):351-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14713</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><mixed-citation>Mihalas BP, Marston AL, Wu LE, et al. Reproductive Ageing: Metabolic contribution to age-related chromosome missegregation in mammalian oocytes. Reproduction. 2024;168(2):e230510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-23-0510</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><mixed-citation>Ferreira AF, Soares M, Almeida-Santos T, et al. Aging and oocyte competence: A molecular cell perspective. WIREs Mechanisms of Disease. 2023;15(5):e1613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.1613</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><mixed-citation>Huang W, Li X, Yang H, et al. The impact of maternal age on aneuploidy in oocytes: Reproductive consequences, molecular mechanisms, and future directions. Ageing Research Reviews. 2024;97:102292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2024.102292</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><mixed-citation>Vakulenko ES, Makarova MR, Gorskiy DI. Reproductive intentions and fertility trends in different countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analytical review of studies. Demographic Review. 2022;9(4):138-159. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v9i4.16747</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><mixed-citation>Zyryanova MA. Fertility and Reproductive Attitudes of the Population Before and After the Epidemiological Situation Worse. Regionology. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2022;30(4):903-923. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.121.030.202204.903-923</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><mixed-citation>Zyryanova MA. Fertility in the COVID-19 pandemic: dynamics reasons. Management Issues. 2022;5:66-80. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2022-5-66-80</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>