<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2658-6533</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Научные результаты биомедицинских исследований</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2658-6533</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2658-6533-2022-8-3-0-9</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2812</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Клиническая медицина</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Особенности постурального баланса у работающих женщин 60-69 лет&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Features of postural balance in working women aged 60-69&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дёмин</surname><given-names>Александр Викторович</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dyomin</surname><given-names>Alexander V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>adi81@yandex.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ильницкий</surname><given-names>Андрей Николаевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ilnitsky</surname><given-names>Andrey N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>a-ilnitski@yandex.by</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кореневич</surname><given-names>Ксения Сергеевна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Korenevich</surname><given-names>Ksenia S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>karat.klinic@mail.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/medicine/2022/3/Биомедисследования_3-2022-120-135.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Актуальность: Формирование государственной политики оптимизации здорового и активного старения, направленной на формирование у пожилых людей стимула к более продолжительной работе, требую новых знаний об особенностях физического и психологического здоровья пенсионеров, продолжающих трудиться. За последние восемь лет в отечественной научной литературе исследования, направленные на выявление особенностей компонентов постурального баланса, включая сенсорную организацию постурального контроля, у работающих женщин пенсионного возраста, в том числе в возрасте 65 лет и старше, практически не отражены. Цель исследования: Оценить эффективность функции равновесия и сенсорной организации постурального контроля у работающих женщин 60-69 лет. Материалы и методы: Были обследованы 153 женщины в возрасте 60-69 лет (средний возраст 64&amp;plusmn;2,7 лет), которые продолжали работать по своей профессии и после выхода на пенсию. Первую возрастную группу составили женщины в возрасте 60-64 года (n=84), вторую &amp;ndash; 65-69 лет (n=69). Для комплексной оценки компонентов равновесия использовали компьютерный комплекс динамической постурографии &amp;laquo;Smart Equitest Balance Manager&amp;raquo;. Проводили Sensory Organization Test (SOT). Результаты: При анализе показателей SOT не было выявлено статистически значимых различий между группами работающих женщин, что позволяет сделать вывод: у работающих женщин в возрасте 65-69 лет не отмечается возрастных изменений в эффективности поддержания и снижения общей результативности статического и статодинамического равновесия, а также адаптационных, физиологических и нейрофизиологических механизмов управления и контроля позой. Также в проведенном исследовании у женщин после 64 лет не наблюдается увеличения колебаний центра тяжести при поддержании статического и особенно статодинамического баланса. Кроме того, у работающих женщин 65-69 лет не выявлено снижения коэффициентов участия соматосенсорной, зрительной и вестибулярной информации в контроле над балансом, включая изменения в сенсорной интеграции постурального контроля. Все это можно рассматривать как предикторы, влияющие на способность к продолжению безопасной трудовой деятельности у женщин после 64 лет. Заключение: У женщин в возрасте 60-69 лет удовлетворенность своим постуральным балансом будет определять уверенность и желание к продолжению успешной трудовой деятельности, а также сохранению своего социального и профессионального статуса</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Background:&amp;nbsp;The formation of the state policy for optimizing healthy and active aging, aimed at creating an incentive for older people to work longer, requires new knowledge about the characteristics of the physical and psychological health of pensioners who continue to work. Over the past eight years, studies aimed at identifying the features of the components of postural balance, including the sensory organization of postural control, in working women of retirement age, including those aged 65 years and older, have practically not been reflected in the domestic scientific literature. The aim of the study:&amp;nbsp;To evaluate the effectiveness of the function of balance and sensory organization of postural control in working women aged 60-69 years. Materials and methods:&amp;nbsp;We examined 153 60-69 years women (mean age 64&amp;plusmn;2.7 years), who continued to work in their profession after retirement. The first age group consisted of women aged 60-64 (n=84), the second &amp;ndash; 65-69 years (n=69). For a comprehensive assessment of the balance components, the Smart Equitest Balance Manager computer complex of dynamic posturography was used. Conducted Sensory Organization Test (SOT). Results:&amp;nbsp;When analyzing the SOT indicators, no statistically significant differences were found between groups of working women, which allows us to conclude that working women aged 65-69 do not show age-related changes in the effectiveness of maintaining and reducing the overall effectiveness of static and statodynamic balance, as well as adaptive, physiological and neurophysiological mechanisms of posture management and control. Also in the study in women after 64 years of age, there is no increase in fluctuations in the center of gravity while maintaining a static and especially static-dynamic balance. In addition, working women aged 65-69 did not show a decrease in the coefficients of participation of somatosensory, visual and vestibular information in balance control, including changes in the sensory integration of postural control. All of these can be seen as predictors of women&amp;#39;s ability to continue working safely after age 64. Conclusion:&amp;nbsp;In 60-69-year-old women, satisfaction with their postural balance will determine the confidence and desire to continue successful work, as well as maintain their social and professional status.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>компьютерная постурография</kwd><kwd>Sensory Organization Test</kwd><kwd>центр тяжести</kwd><kwd>поддержание статического и статодинамического баланса</kwd><kwd>работающие женщины 60-69 лет</kwd><kwd>трудовая деятельность на пенсии</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>computer posturography</kwd><kwd>Sensory Organization Test</kwd><kwd>center of gravity</kwd><kwd>maintaining static and statodynamic balance</kwd><kwd>working women aged 60-69</kwd><kwd>working life in retirement</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Гудков АБ, Чащин ВП, Демин АВ, и др. Оценка качества жизни и постурального баланса у женщин старших возрастных групп, продолжающих работу в своей профессии. Медицина труда и промышленная экология. 2019;(8):473-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2019-59-8-473-478</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Silva TA, Mansine DP, Santos IN, et al. Analysis of quality of life, sociodemographic variables and self-reported diseases among working older adults. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho. 2019;17(2):154-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1679443520190349</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Baltes BB, Rudolph CW, Zacher H. Work across the lifespan (1st Edition). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Dantas RG, Perracini MR, Guerra RO, et al. What are the sociodemographic and health determinants for older adults continue to participate in work? Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2017;71:136-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.04.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Bryant EC, Trew ME, Bruce AM, et al. Gender differences in balance performance at the time of retirement. Clinical Biomechanics. 2005;20(3):330-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.11.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Palmer KT, Goodson N. Ageing, musculoskeletal health and work. Best Practice and Research in Clinical Rheumatology. 2015;29(3):391-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2015.03.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Nakamura K, Kitamura K, Oshiki R, et al. Prolonged occupational activity and 6-year changes in postural sway in elderly women. Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions. 2015;15(1):78-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Гудков АБ, Дёмин АВ, Попова ОН, и др. Характеристика постурального баланса у женщин, переживших пожар в пожилом возрасте. Медико-биологические и социально-психологические проблемы безопасности в чрезвычайных ситуациях. 2018;(4):68-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25016/2541-7487-2018-0-4-68-75</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Дёмин АВ, Гудков АБ, Долгобородова АА, и др. Возрастная характеристика постурального баланса у женщин 60-69 лет. Журнал медико-биологических исследований. 2018;6(4):332-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2542-1298.2018.6.4.332&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>NeuroCom International. Balance Manager Systems. Clinical Operations Guide. NeuroCom International, Inc., a division of Natus: Clackamas (OR); 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>ER Pletcher, VJ Williams, Abt JP, et al. Normative Data for the NeuroCom Sensory Organization Test in US Military Special Operations Forces. Journal of Athletic Training. 2017;52(2):129-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-52.1.05</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Ford-Smith CD, Wyman JF, Elswick Jr RK, et al. Test-retest reliability of the sensory organization test in noninstitutionalized older adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1995;76(1):77-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80047-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Wrisley DM, Stephens MJ, Mosley S, et al. Learning Effects of Repetitive Administrations of the Sensory Organization Test in Healthy Young Adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2007;88(8):1049-1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Гудков АБ, Дёмин АВ, Долгобородова АА, и др. Характеристика постурального контроля у флорболисток национальной сборной России в соревновательном периоде. Теория и практика физической культуры. 2017;2:23-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Colburn D, Russo L, Burkard R, et al. Firefighter protective clothing and self-contained breathing apparatus does not alter balance testing using a standard sensory organization test or motor control test in healthy, rested individuals. Applied Ergonomics. 2019;80:187-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Dickin DC, Clark S. Generalizability of the Sensory Organization Test in College-Aged Males: Obtaining a Reliable Performance Measure. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2007;17(2):109-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0b013e31803bf647</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Haran FJ, Slaboda JC, King LA, et al. Sensitivity of the Balance Error Scoring System and the Sensory Organization Test in the Combat Environment. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2016;33(7):705-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.4060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Row J, Chan L, Damiano D, et al. Balance Assessment in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comparison of the Sensory Organization and Limits of Stability Tests. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2019;36(16):2435-2442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2018.5755</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Lord SR, Sherrington C. Falls in Older People: Risk Factors, Strategies for Prevention and Implications for Practice, 3rd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Cohen H, Heaton LG, Congdon SL, et al. Changes in Sensory Organization Test Scores with Age. Age and Ageing. 1996;25(1):39-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/25.1.39</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Keenan KA, Wohleber MF, Perlsweig KA, et al. Association of prospective lower extremity musculoskeletal injury and musculoskeletal, balance, and physiological characteristics in Special Operations Forces. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2017;20(4):S34-S39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Marusic U, Taube W, Morrison SA, et al. Aging effects on prefrontal cortex oxygenation in a posture-cognition dual-task: an fNIRS pilot study. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity. 2019;2:16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-018-0209-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>DiDomenico A, McGorry RW, Huang YH, et al. Perceptions of postural stability after transitioning to standing among construction workers. Safety Science. 2010;48(2):166-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.07.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Di Gessa G, Corna L, Price D, et al. The decision to work after state pension age and how it affects quality of life: evidence from a 6-year English panel study. Age and Ageing. 2018;47(3):450-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx181</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Gao KL, Hui-Chan CWY, Tsang WWN, et al. Golfers have better balance control and confidence than healthy controls. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2011;111(11):2805-2812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1910-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Fisher GG, Chaffee DS, Tetrick LE, et al. Cognitive functioning, aging, and work: A review and recommendations for research and practice. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2017;22(3):314-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000086</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Potvin-Desrochers A, Richer N, Lajoie Y. Cognitive tasks promote automatization of postural control in young and older adults. Gait and Posture. 2017;57:40-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Clarke P, Marshall VW, Weir D. Unexpected Retirement from Full Time Work after Age 62: Consequences for Life Satisfaction in older Americans. European Journal of Ageing. 2012;9(3):207-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-012-0229-5</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>