DOI: 10.18413/2658-6533-2023-9-2-0-1

Mendelian randomization: using genetic information in epidemiological studies (review)

Background: Mendelian randomization is a research method that exploits the instrumental variable framework using genetic information to assess the causality of the relationship between modifiable risk factors and health indicators (or socioeconomic traits). Over the past 5 years, according to Scopus, more than 4.6 thousand papers related to the use of Mendelian randomization have been published. The aim of the study: To study the statistical approaches used in the Mendelian randomization and evaluate the possibilities of using this method in genetic epidemiology. Materials and methods: The analysis of international scientific literature on the theory and practical application of Mendelian randomization in establishing and evaluating the causal effect of modifiable risk factors on outcomes was carried out. Results: This article provides a brief introduction to the theoretical foundations of Mendelian randomization, covering the main concepts, criteria, and evaluation methods. This paper provides an example of a study in which Mendelian randomization was used, it also describes the main areas of application of this method in epidemiology and the prospects for using the method in the future. Conclusion: The effect estimate obtained in Mendelian randomization is less prone to bias compared to one obtained in observational studies, since genetic variants are randomly assigned from parents to offspring and, as a result, should not be associated with potential confounding factors affecting the association of a risk factor with an outcome. Mendelian randomization allows one to assess and evaluate a causal relationship, and to determine causal risk factors for the development of a particular disease. A huge amount of genetic information is available in the genome-wide association studies era; that makes it easier to conduct the MR analysis.

Keywords: Mendelian randomization, epidemiology, causality, genetics.

Number of views: 1041 (view statistics)

Количество скачиваний: 1414

Full text (HTML)Full text (PDF)To articles list

Information for citation:

Plotnikov DY. Mendelian randomization: using genetic information in epidemiological studies (review). Research Results in Biomedicine. 2023;9(2):158-172. Russian. DOI:10.18413/2658-6533-2023-9-2-0-1

User comments
Reference lists

While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.

Koterov AN. Causal Criteria in Medical and Biological Disciplines: History, Essenceand Radiation Aspect. Report 1. Problem Statement, Conceptionof Causes and Causation, False Associations. Radiation biology. Radioecology. 2019;59(1):5-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869803119010065
Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Causation and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. American Journal of Public Health. 2005;95(S1):S144-S150. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204
Parascandola M. Causation in epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2001;55(12):905-912. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1136/jech.55.12.905
Fedak KM, Bernal A, Capshaw ZA, et al. Applying the Bradford Hill criteria in the 21st century: how data integration has changed causal inference in molecular epidemiology. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology. 2015;12(1):14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-015-0037-4
Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. The Lancet. 2002;359(9302):248-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07451-2
Hammerton G, Munafò MR. Causal inference with observational data: the need for triangulation of evidence. Psychological Medicine. 2021;51(4):563-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720005127
Evans DM, Davey Smith G. Mendelian Randomization: New Applications in the Coming Age of Hypothesis-Free Causality. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 2015;16(1):327-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-050016
Klungel OH, Martens EP, Psaty BM, et al. Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2004;57(12):1223-1231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.011
Katan MB. Apoupoprotein e isoforms, serum cholesterol, and cancer. The Lancet. 1986;327(8479):507-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)92972-7
Gray R, Wheatley K. How to avoid bias when comparing bone marrow transplantation with chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 1991;7(3):9-12.
Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? International Journal of Epidemiology. 2003;32(1):1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyg070
Sanderson E, Glymour MM, Holmes MV, et al. Mendelian randomization. Nature Reviews Methods Primers. 2022;2(1):6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2015;44(2):512-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv080
Hartwig FP, Davey Smith G, Bowden J. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2017;46(6):1985-1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx102
Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, et al. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nature Genetics. 2018;50(5):693-698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7
Tyler AL, Asselbergs FW, Williams SM, et al. Shadows of complexity: what biological networks reveal about epistasis and pleiotropy. BioEssays. 2009;31(2):220-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.200800022
Hemani G, Bowden J, Davey Smith G. Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies. Human Molecular Genetics. 2018;27(R2):R195-R208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddy163
Timpson NJ, Harbord R, Davey Smith G, et al. Does Greater Adiposity Increase Blood Pressure and Hypertension Risk?: Mendelian Randomization Using the FTO/MC4R Genotype. Hypertension. 2009;54(1):84-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.130005
The International Schizophrenia Consortium. Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature. 2009;460(7256):748-752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08185
Bound J, Jaeger DA, Baker RM. Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogeneous Explanatory Variable is Weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1995;90(430):443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2291055
Boehm FJ, Zhou X. Statistical methods for Mendelian randomization in genome-wide association studies: A review. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 2022;20:2338-2351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.05.015
Buniello A, MacArthur JAL, Cerezo M, et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Research. 2019;47(D1):D1005-D1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1120
Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. eLife. 2018;7:e34408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34408
Elsworth B, Lyon M, Alexander T, et al. The MRC IEU OpenGWAS Data Infrastructure. BioRxiv. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.10.244293
Staley JR, Burgess S. Semiparametric methods for estimation of a nonlinear exposure-outcome relationship using instrumental variables with application to Mendelian randomization. Genetic Epidemiology. 2017;41(4):341-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.22041
Sulc J, Sjaarda J, Kutalik Z. Polynomial Mendelian randomization reveals non-linear causal effects for obesity-related traits. Human Genetics and Genomics Advances. 2022;3(3):100124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100124
Arvanitis M, Qi G, Bhatt DL, et al. Linear and Nonlinear Mendelian Randomization Analyses of the Association Between Diastolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Events: The J-Curve Revisited. Circulation. 2021;143(9):895-906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049819
Sun YQ, Burgess S, Staley JR, et al. Body mass index and all cause mortality in HUNT and UK Biobank studies: linear and non-linear mendelian randomisation analyses. BMJ. 2019;364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1042
Zhou A, Selvanayagam JB, Hyppönen E. Non-linear Mendelian randomization analyses support a role for vitamin D deficiency in cardiovascular disease risk. European Heart Journal. 2022;43(18):1731-1739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab809
Sanderson E, Davey Smith G, Windmeijer F, et al. An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2019;48(3):713-727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy262
Richardson TG, Sanderson E, Palmer TM, et al. Evaluating the relationship between circulating lipoprotein lipids and apolipoproteins with risk of coronary heart disease: A multivariable Mendelian randomisation analysis. PLoS Medicine. 2020;17(3):e1003062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003062
Johnson KE, Siewert KM, Klarin D, et al. The relationship between circulating lipids and breast cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study. PLoS Medicine. 2020;17(9):e1003302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003302
Mountjoy E, Davies NM, Plotnikov D, et al. Education and myopia: assessing the direction of causality by mendelian randomisation. BMJ. 2018;361:k2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2022
Sun X, Liu B, Liu S, et al. Sleep disturbance and psychiatric disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomisation study. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. 2022;31:e26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796021000810
Zheng J, Haberland V, Baird D, et al. Phenome-wide Mendelian randomization mapping the influence of the plasma proteome on complex diseases. Nature Genetics. 2020;52(10):1122-1131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-020-0682-6
Magnus MC, Borges MC, Fraser A, et al. Identifying potential causal effects of age at menopause: a Mendelian randomization phenome-wide association study. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2022;37(9):971-982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-022-00903-3
Zheng J, Baird D, Borges MC, et al. Recent Developments in Mendelian Randomization Studies. Current Epidemiology Reports. 2017;4(4):330-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-017-0128-6
Richardson TG, Sanderson E, Elsworth B, et al. Use of genetic variation to separate the effects of early and later life adiposity on disease risk: mendelian randomisation study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1203. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1136/bmj.m1203
Dixon P, Davey Smith G, von Hinke S, et al. Estimating Marginal Healthcare Costs Using Genetic Variants as Instrumental Variables: Mendelian Randomization in Economic Evaluation. PharmacoEconomics. 2016;34(11):1075-1086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0432-x
Sonehara K, Okada Y. Genomics-driven drug discovery based on disease-susceptibility genes. Inflammation and Regeneration. 2021;41(1):8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-021-00158-7
Schmidt AF, Finan C, Gordillo-Marañón M, et al. Genetic drug target validation using Mendelian randomisation. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1):3255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16969-0
Han X, Ong JS, An J, et al. Using Mendelian randomization to evaluate the causal relationship between serum C-reactive protein levels and age-related macular degeneration. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2020;35(2):139-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00598-z

All journals

Send article

Research Results in Biomedicine is included in the scientific database of the RINTs (license agreement No. 765-12/2014 dated 08.12.2014).

The journal is included in the list of peer-reviewed scientific publications recommended by the Higher Attestation Commission

The journal is indexed by the following scientific databases and platforms

Research Results in Biomedicine (ISSN 2658-6533)

The journal materials and website are licensed under Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 International.

The Founder: Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Belgorod National Research University"The Founder’s address: 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, the Belgorod region, 308015, Russia

The Publisher: Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of HigherEducation "Belgorod National Research University" The Founder’s address:85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, the Belgorod region, 308015, Russia

Editors Office: chief editor Mikhail I. Churnosov, e-mail: RR_MedPharm@bsu.edu.ru, phone: +7 (4722) 30-14-03.

Regulations on the Journal

Certificate

Have questions?
You can write to us:

✉ Content manager

✉ Site administration

✉ Executive Secretary